“Who wrote this?” has an answer, and it is written down.
Generative AI in regulated training fails on accountability, not on quality. Kre8AI is built so that every claim traces to a document, every course passes through a named human, and the record survives the person who made it.
Every slide names the page it came from
Generated content is retrieved from the material you uploaded. Each slide carries up to four citations, and each citation records:
- The source document name
- The page range, or the timestamp for audio and video
- The exact excerpt the slide was written from
- A numeric confidence score
The confidence score matters more than it first appears. It tells a reviewer where to spend their attention, which turns review from reading everything into checking the handful of slides the system was least sure about.
A slide with the citation panel open, showing the source document, page range, excerpt and confidence score.
public/screens/citation-panel.pngThree modes, because not every reviewer is doing the same job
Sending everything through one approval process is how review becomes a rubber stamp. Each request specifies what is actually being asked of the reviewer.
Formal approval
Reviewers approve or request changes, module by module. The course cannot be published until every module carries an approval.
Comment only
Feedback without a gate, for the subject-matter expert whose opinion you want but whose sign-off you do not need.
Compliance sign-off
An audit-logged review mode for the person who is accountable for the content being correct. The decision and its timestamp are recorded against the course.
The review screen showing per-module approval status and a reviewer comment thread.
public/screens/review-approval.pngThe gate is real
Approval is tracked per module, not per course. Publishing is blocked until every module has been approved, so a course cannot slip out because one section was never looked at.
Reviewers can leave a comment and have the author apply it with AI assistance, but the rewritten slide still needs a human to accept it. The loop always closes on a person.
The record outlasts the project
AI-assisted and human actions are recorded against the course: what was generated, who edited it, who reviewed it, what they decided, and when. Course versions preserve the history, so you can show what the training said at the time an incident occurred rather than what it says now.
Access is role-based across platform admin, organisation admin, author, reviewer and viewer. External reviewers reach only the course they were invited to.
How your data is isolated and storedThe audit trail view listing generation events, edits, review decisions and approvals with actors and timestamps.
public/screens/audit-trail.png